WAS ESTONIA JUST A TRAGIC SHIP ACCIDENT?

I don’t think so and I will show you what really happened!

Listen to the chronicle in English by clicking the play button.

Please write a comment in Swedish or English below this article!

Lyssna på krönikan på svenska genom att klicka på spelarpilen,

PS. OBS! Gillar du denna eller andra artiklar här på Honesty4u, så skicka gärna länkar till alla du känner samt ut på sociala medier.
Glöm inte att även kommentera krönikan nedan. Det är alltid trevligt med lite feedback. DS.

September 28, 1994 will go to the history for more than one reason.
It was not only the day for the biggest catastrophe in sea ever in Scandinavia.
It was also the beginning of the biggest lie ever told to common people!
The big passenger ship Estonia sank that night!
852 people died and only 138 people were saved by other ships and helicopters.

Accidents happen and it is impossible to avoid them. It can also be a lot of reasons to an accident.
In this case it was not an accident!
It was an explosion under the waterline that sank Estonia!

Already the same morning in the biggest newspaper in Sweden, Dagens Nyheter, DN, a civil engineer and expert said, that the main reason for the accident was because the main bow visor to car deck in the front of the ship was broken.
How could he possibly know that?
No survivors had been heard yet and the ship was in the bottom of the sea!
This is also a really stupid and ignorant remark coming from a technical ship expert.
The car deck is over the waterline and the ship is watertight from there down to the bottom deck.
This actually means, that even if the ship takes in a lot of water on car deck it will never sink.
There is still something called Archimedes law!
That law makes every ship in the world to float despite how big they are.

What possibly can happen, is that the ferry will turn around and float with the bottom up.
That did not happen this night.

Every word in media from now on were focused on that Estonia took in water on car deck.

One of the surviving crew member told that Estonia’s big water pumps was already trying to get the water out from the bottom deck of the ship.
How did the water get in to the bottom of the ship if the construction is watertight from car deck and down?
Nobody discussed that question! Some tried but they were silenced immediately.
Logical questions were probably prohibited.
Why?
Was it something in this tragedy that should be hidden?
Yes, there were a lot of details and secrets that went down with Estonia that night.

Why would anybody lie about what happened and try to block logical questions?
Well, the reason for lying is the same as when a friend lies to you. The lie will protect the liar because he will lose something if the truth will come out.
Sometimes you don’t have to lie. Instead you just put out a smoke screen so people will start to think in a wrong direction.
The official investigators did a lot of that.

The only interesting question; how it is even possible that this type of ferry can sink if it takes in water from the car deck, was never answered!
It will never be answered either!
The only way for a ferry like this to sink, is if it is a hole in the bottom!
If it is not, it may turn around bottom up but it will never sink!
I don’t think Archimedes was wrong!

Were there any proof that it was a hole in the bottom of the ship?
Yes it was!
A diver, Gregg Bemis, was down there and took photos on a big hole in Estonia’s bottom.

I’m not an expert in this but the hole shows clearly that it must have been an explosion or a collision that made the hole.
What caused the explosion?
Was it a torpedo, an explosion device or a collision?
The steel plates was bent in to the ship, which means that the force is coming from outside.
It was not an explosion from inside.
A collision seems to be impossible because it was almost 100 meter deep in that area.
Or was it maybe not impossible?

According to the investigating commission the hole in the ship bottom does not exist!
The investigating commission didn’t like to talk about it anymore.
Funny story!
I mean, if there is a photo showing the hole, either there is a hole or the photo is a fake.
Why not investigate it or go down with other divers and make a new photo?
Maybe someone did not like the truth?

If we just use some common sense here we have another fact that actually proves that the leaking water came from below the car deck.
People were running up in panic from deck 1 and deck 2 under the waterline and below the car deck.
That means that the leak in the ship must come from below the waterline.
The water can’t possibly come from car deck and go down, because of the ship’s watertight construction.

The car deck bow visor was blown away and was found 1 560 meters from Estonia.
It was loosen from the ship according to the official theory!
If the hole below the waterline was caused by, that the bow visor in car deck was loosen, then it is absolutely impossible that the bow visor itself was found so far away from the ship.
That fact creates a new question!
Was the bow visor blown away before or after Estonia sank?
Many terrible facts say, after!

In that case it also explained why Swedish Navy marked the wrong place in the water for that bow visor.
For several months they also marked Estonia’s position with a bleu floating device wrong! About 2, 1 kilometre wrong!
Why?
Was there a reason?
Of course it is always a reason for everything in this world.
Was it to keep curious people away from Estonia?
No hardly! In that case there are better ways to do that.

A relative organization held a sea funeral for the dead ones more than 2 100 meters away from Estonia. They thought they were standing right above Estonia marked with that blue floating device.

In my mind I can think of one more reason they marked the place wrongly!
Maybe it was to be able to blow away the bow visor from the ship under the water, and transport it 1 560 meters west away from the real position of the ship!
It would have looked stupid if the bow visor was still attached to the ship if someone wanted to take more photos.
I mean an enormous big ship like Estonia is really not hard to find with sonar or other technologies.
If someone tried to find her and take new photos, it would be a hard time for the commission to explain their previous lies.
Then the official explanation why Estonia sank would not hold water.

There is of course a reason why the government won’t like us to know why there was a big hole in Estonia under the waterline.
I will explain that too for you later on in this text.

Estonia was covered with concrete there at the bottom of the Baltic Sea. It also became the last resting place for 852 dead people.

The only thing the investigating commission really did, was to create more question marks!
These questions will never be answered.

So what happened then?

Why all these strange facts with wrong positions in the sea of the bow visor and the ship?
Why are there edits in original video tapes from several diving expeditions made by the Swedish and Finnish Navy?
Why are video logs missing?
Why does none of the official videos show the part of the ship were Gregg Bemis found a big hole under the waterline and took photos of it?
About 30 hours of videos were taken but none shows the part of the ship were Gregg Bemis took his photos. How is that even possible?
The best question of them all; why are there so many question marks?

The answer is simple! It’s a cover up!

So, what was behind this tragic “accident”?

The answer is, I don’t know, but somebody else knows!
I can only guess according to certain facts.
One of these facts was that Estonia was used to transport secret electronic devises from the Russian military to Sweden from the country Estonia.
The USSR was just falling apart and when that happened some of these secret high tech electronic devises was stolen from former USSR.
The passenger ferry Estonia was used to bring the devices over to Sweden and later on they were transported from Sweden to USA.
This had been going on for awhile.

The Swedish military did admit that, but they could not say if Estonia had that type of secret devises in her cargo this particular night.
Of course they knew, but they are not allowed to say!
They were not allowed to admit other things either, but finally so many people were talking that it was impossible to keep these secret cargos as a secret anymore.

Another little strange coincident was a photo of a Russian submarine coming in to the harbour of Murmansk up in northern part of Russia. The tower of the submarine was heavily damaged.
How can a submarine get damaged in the tower?
According to a drunken crew member of that submarine they just came from a mission in the Baltic Sea.
According to the submarines own log book it had never left the harbour at all. Where the damage came from, nobody knew.
The photo shows the submarine coming in to the harbour with that damage on the tower, so obviously that was a lie!

If you compare the damage of that submarine’s tower to the big hole in the side of Estonia that Gregg Bemis took a photo of, it seems to fit in rather well. Maybe the submarine came to close to Estonia in the hard weather and actually collide with her?

According to German divers they also saw another big hole in the bottom of Estonia. That hole was covered with lots of sand. The sand did not belong to the surrounding bottom of the sea.
Someone obviously put it there to cover something.

My theory about the Russian submarine also explains the big explosion some of the survivors talked about. If there was a collision it also explain the big bang and “hit” some of the passengers told about a few minutes later.
One torpedo and one collision!

That also explains why this big ferry did not turned around bottom up and also why Estonia sank in about 20 minutes. That’s a very short time for this type of ferry.
Normally these types of ferries don’t sink at all!
Archimedes was not wrong!

Another thing is of course that the Russians sooner or later found out which way the stolen secret devices took. They have intelligence too and of course they try to stop the devices getting in to the hands of the Americans.
Where and how is the best way to stop the transport?
Of course at sea with a submarine so nobody can see who you are!
Otherwise you have to invade another country.

For sure I can be wrong about everything in my little investigation here, but every other investigation I’ve seen doesn’t hold water better than the bottom of Estonia.
The guessing is free!
What I do know for sure, is that the official explanation of this tragedy is a lie.
The truth is in the bottom of the Baltic Sea.

/Lasse A.